Comments on: On Nightwing Annual #2 http://www.4thletter.net/2007/04/on-nightwing-annual-2/ we like talking about comics, and hopefully you like reading us talking about comics. Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:07:03 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: mysteryfan http://www.4thletter.net/2007/04/on-nightwing-annual-2/comment-page-1/#comment-23619 mysteryfan Wed, 22 Apr 2009 17:23:17 +0000 http://www.4thletter.net/?p=441#comment-23619 Oh, and I meant to say, I really, really like your thoughts on the editorial mandate process. <i>Seriously DC, stop with Continuity Patch Comix(TM).</i> Yes! Oh, and I meant to say, I really, really like your thoughts on the editorial mandate process.

Seriously DC, stop with Continuity Patch Comix(TM).
Yes!

]]> By: mysteryfan http://www.4thletter.net/2007/04/on-nightwing-annual-2/comment-page-1/#comment-23617 mysteryfan Wed, 22 Apr 2009 17:20:42 +0000 http://www.4thletter.net/?p=441#comment-23617 Hey! Just found this. I also hate NW Annual #2 and thank you for this piece. Very much agreed. Hey! Just found this. I also hate NW Annual #2 and thank you for this piece. Very much agreed.

]]> By: Alex http://www.4thletter.net/2007/04/on-nightwing-annual-2/comment-page-1/#comment-16527 Alex Wed, 26 Sep 2007 15:30:08 +0000 http://www.4thletter.net/?p=441#comment-16527 damn, i was surprised to see that everybody hated this so much. Compared to what the Nightwing run has been like lately, I think this was a breath of fresh air. damn, i was surprised to see that everybody hated this so much. Compared to what the Nightwing run has been like lately, I think this was a breath of fresh air.

]]> By: Blog@Newsarama » You paint a funny face like a chick. http://www.4thletter.net/2007/04/on-nightwing-annual-2/comment-page-1/#comment-15570 Blog@Newsarama » You paint a funny face like a chick. Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:58:10 +0000 http://www.4thletter.net/?p=441#comment-15570 [...] people didn’t like Nightwing Annual #2 very much. This was like if someone asked me “Hey, what’re some things you don’t particularly care to [...] [...] people didn’t like Nightwing Annual #2 very much. This was like if someone asked me “Hey, what’re some things you don’t particularly care to [...]

]]> By: david brothers http://www.4thletter.net/2007/04/on-nightwing-annual-2/comment-page-1/#comment-15544 david brothers Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:41:53 +0000 http://www.4thletter.net/?p=441#comment-15544 Okay, the idea that this was an intended storyline, rather than the mopping up of a dropped one, somehow makes all this worse. I could excuse a bit of sloppiness if you're trying to tie up loose ends, kind of, but to have this be part of your OYL Plan? Bravo. I've been reading Nightwing from the beginning, and that first year or so is pretty rock solid. Dixon and McDaniel were doing good work! I'm up to issue 60 now, and the series took a nosedive when Greg Land came on. The Trevor McCarthy stuff I'm on now is okayish, but that's about it. Okay, the idea that this was an intended storyline, rather than the mopping up of a dropped one, somehow makes all this worse. I could excuse a bit of sloppiness if you’re trying to tie up loose ends, kind of, but to have this be part of your OYL Plan? Bravo.

I’ve been reading Nightwing from the beginning, and that first year or so is pretty rock solid. Dixon and McDaniel were doing good work! I’m up to issue 60 now, and the series took a nosedive when Greg Land came on. The Trevor McCarthy stuff I’m on now is okayish, but that’s about it.

]]>