Comments on: Fourcast! 07: Read on a Wednesday

By: Stig

Stig — Mon, 20 Jul 2009 10:34:47 +0000

@Gavok: With a bonus bit of commentary demonstrating how Selina or an alternate version of Selina can’t appear in “Superman/Batman” without mentioning how much she wants to shag Batman.

By: Gavok

Gavok — Mon, 20 Jul 2009 00:42:17 +0000

Hearing Esther’s idea for a Catwoman article, I believe she should make it into a full-on series.

We Meow a Lot.

By: Journalista - the news weblog of The Comics Journal » Blog Archive » July 17, 2009: Becoming a bummer

Fri, 17 Jul 2009 12:37:24 +0000

[...] discussing comics, part one: Fourcast! [...]

By: Mark Cook

Mark Cook — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 17:05:34 +0000

@Paul Wilson: Yeah, they were split apart in Avengers Forever, and as far as I know, all their children came after that point. Although I suppose there may have been some heirs to Rama-Tut’s throne kicking around ancient Egypt, once upon a time.

@david brothers: I kinda feel the same way about the Avengers, with the notable exception being Kurt Busiek’s work on the book; he used Kang for all of Avengers Forever and also for his last year and a bit on the title, so that stuff came up from time to time.

By: Paul Wilson

Paul Wilson — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 09:20:48 +0000

@david brothers: Aren’t Kang and Immortus the same person? I feel like I read that somewhere, but Avengers lore has never been my thing. (It puts me to sleep.)

Immortus was who Kang was supposed to become when he outgrew his whole Conquering phase and settled down at the end of time. Kang, understandably didn’t like the idea of that and spent time trying desperately not to become that guy.

I think Avengers Forever basically split the two off, so that Kang is no longer fated to become Immortus.