Comments on: This Week in Panels: Week 5 http://www.4thletter.net/2009/10/this-week-in-panels-week-5/ we like talking about comics, and hopefully you like reading us talking about comics. Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:07:03 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: Nathan http://www.4thletter.net/2009/10/this-week-in-panels-week-5/comment-page-1/#comment-28203 Nathan Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:24:23 +0000 http://www.4thletter.net/?p=4498#comment-28203 @<a href="#comment-28190">Meekrat</a>: XD @Meekrat: XD

]]> By: 4thletter! » Blog Archive » Not Brave & Bold: Just Stupid. http://www.4thletter.net/2009/10/this-week-in-panels-week-5/comment-page-1/#comment-28194 4thletter! » Blog Archive » Not Brave & Bold: Just Stupid. Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:57:45 +0000 http://www.4thletter.net/?p=4498#comment-28194 [...] threw in a brief mention of it on Sunday, but I wanted to come back around and reiterate exactly how unbelievably stupid Brave and Bold 28 [...] [...] threw in a brief mention of it on Sunday, but I wanted to come back around and reiterate exactly how unbelievably stupid Brave and Bold 28 [...]

]]> By: Gavok http://www.4thletter.net/2009/10/this-week-in-panels-week-5/comment-page-1/#comment-28192 Gavok Wed, 28 Oct 2009 01:26:05 +0000 http://www.4thletter.net/?p=4498#comment-28192 @<a href="#comment-28188">Derk van Santvoort</a>: Because it's fucking hilarious, that's why. @Derk van Santvoort: Because it’s fucking hilarious, that’s why.

]]> By: Meekrat http://www.4thletter.net/2009/10/this-week-in-panels-week-5/comment-page-1/#comment-28190 Meekrat Wed, 28 Oct 2009 00:46:53 +0000 http://www.4thletter.net/?p=4498#comment-28190 I have always maintained that crying Doctor Doom was either a Doom-bot, or he was just crying because he didn't think of it first. I have always maintained that crying Doctor Doom was either a Doom-bot, or he was just crying because he didn’t think of it first.

]]> By: Derk van Santvoort http://www.4thletter.net/2009/10/this-week-in-panels-week-5/comment-page-1/#comment-28188 Derk van Santvoort Tue, 27 Oct 2009 21:02:51 +0000 http://www.4thletter.net/?p=4498#comment-28188 @<a href="#comment-28187">Nathan</a>: I'm going by memory here, but I think that the character that was inserted into the story was Juggernaut (the issue being that he had tried to destroy the WTC himself in an old X-Force/Spider-Man crossover, making it rather... unfortunate that he was used), not Doom. But honestly, I'm not sure why everyone is (still) so bent out of shape about Doom crying. So Dr. Doom, in an out of continuity story in which the superheroes and villains function purely on a symbolic level, cried. Big deal. @Nathan: I’m going by memory here, but I think that the character that was inserted into the story was Juggernaut (the issue being that he had tried to destroy the WTC himself in an old X-Force/Spider-Man crossover, making it rather… unfortunate that he was used), not Doom.

But honestly, I’m not sure why everyone is (still) so bent out of shape about Doom crying. So Dr. Doom, in an out of continuity story in which the superheroes and villains function purely on a symbolic level, cried. Big deal.

]]>