<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This Week in Panels: Week 9</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.4thletter.net/2009/11/this-week-in-panels-week-9/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.4thletter.net/2009/11/this-week-in-panels-week-9/</link>
	<description>we like talking about comics, and hopefully you like reading us talking about comics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:31:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: clay</title>
		<link>http://www.4thletter.net/2009/11/this-week-in-panels-week-9/comment-page-1/#comment-29333</link>
		<dc:creator>clay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.4thletter.net/?p=4597#comment-29333</guid>
		<description>For me, I&#039;m enjoying the plotlines more in the main Deadpool title, but I find Merc with a Mouth much funnier.  Which is important in Deadpool.  You&#039;re right; Team-up needs to develop more before assessment.

Actually, I probably liked the Kelly-written ASM issue with Deadpool more than any issues of his own book since Cable &amp; Deadpool was canceled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me, I&#8217;m enjoying the plotlines more in the main Deadpool title, but I find Merc with a Mouth much funnier.  Which is important in Deadpool.  You&#8217;re right; Team-up needs to develop more before assessment.</p>
<p>Actually, I probably liked the Kelly-written ASM issue with Deadpool more than any issues of his own book since Cable &amp; Deadpool was canceled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gavok</title>
		<link>http://www.4thletter.net/2009/11/this-week-in-panels-week-9/comment-page-1/#comment-29305</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 05:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.4thletter.net/?p=4597#comment-29305</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-29293&quot;&gt;clay&lt;/a&gt;: It&#039;s hard to judge Thunderbolts by the first issue, but it has promise. Especially because the next issue is the obligatory &quot;Jeff Parker is writing this so...&quot; crossover with Agents of Atlas.

Great idea with the Deadpool article. I&#039;ll give that a couple more issues of Team-Up before starting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a class="atr_link" href="#comment-29293">clay</a>: It&#8217;s hard to judge Thunderbolts by the first issue, but it has promise. Especially because the next issue is the obligatory &#8220;Jeff Parker is writing this so&#8230;&#8221; crossover with Agents of Atlas.</p>
<p>Great idea with the Deadpool article. I&#8217;ll give that a couple more issues of Team-Up before starting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clay</title>
		<link>http://www.4thletter.net/2009/11/this-week-in-panels-week-9/comment-page-1/#comment-29293</link>
		<dc:creator>clay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.4thletter.net/?p=4597#comment-29293</guid>
		<description>Man, I gotta get to the shop.  I missed last week.  I was enjoying Diggle on Thunderbolts, but I&#039;m a big Jeff Parker fan.  Is the new issue as promising as I think it&#039;ll be?

I&#039;d also be interested in a longish form essay from you on how the current Deadpool books stack up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, I gotta get to the shop.  I missed last week.  I was enjoying Diggle on Thunderbolts, but I&#8217;m a big Jeff Parker fan.  Is the new issue as promising as I think it&#8217;ll be?</p>
<p>I&#8217;d also be interested in a longish form essay from you on how the current Deadpool books stack up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlLoggins</title>
		<link>http://www.4thletter.net/2009/11/this-week-in-panels-week-9/comment-page-1/#comment-29260</link>
		<dc:creator>AlLoggins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.4thletter.net/?p=4597#comment-29260</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re overthinking it.  By which I mean you&#039;re thinking about it period.

OMD was a magic answer because there wasn&#039;t a logical method to do what editorial wanted for the character without extensive backtracking and loophole-closing that Marvel tries to avoid of late to the point that even footnote captions are seen as bad form.  OMD has created a great many continuity glitches and logical failures in the overall timeline, but let&#039;s face it: Spidey met the Beatles and Flash Thompson was a Vietnam veteran - and that was BEFORE the whole Deal With The Devil gig.  It&#039;s a bit redundant to start questioning the integrity of the backstory now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re overthinking it.  By which I mean you&#8217;re thinking about it period.</p>
<p>OMD was a magic answer because there wasn&#8217;t a logical method to do what editorial wanted for the character without extensive backtracking and loophole-closing that Marvel tries to avoid of late to the point that even footnote captions are seen as bad form.  OMD has created a great many continuity glitches and logical failures in the overall timeline, but let&#8217;s face it: Spidey met the Beatles and Flash Thompson was a Vietnam veteran &#8211; and that was BEFORE the whole Deal With The Devil gig.  It&#8217;s a bit redundant to start questioning the integrity of the backstory now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.4thletter.net/2009/11/this-week-in-panels-week-9/comment-page-1/#comment-29259</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.4thletter.net/?p=4597#comment-29259</guid>
		<description>To kill Gwen Stacy to get to Spider-Man, Osborn doesn&#039;t need to know that she&#039;s Spider-Man&#039;s girlfriend.  If he thinks Spider-Man and Peter Parker are partners (since he takes all of Spider-Man&#039;s pictures) that could lead him to Gwen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To kill Gwen Stacy to get to Spider-Man, Osborn doesn&#8217;t need to know that she&#8217;s Spider-Man&#8217;s girlfriend.  If he thinks Spider-Man and Peter Parker are partners (since he takes all of Spider-Man&#8217;s pictures) that could lead him to Gwen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
